Game Of Thrones: Who Truly Deserved The Iron Throne?

Hey everyone! Let's dive into one of the biggest pop culture phenomena of the 21st century: Game of Thrones. We're talking dragons, White Walkers, backstabbing, and, of course, the ultimate prize – the Iron Throne. But after eight seasons of epic battles, political intrigue, and character arcs that kept us glued to our screens, who really deserved to rule Westeros? That's the question we're going to tackle today. Buckle up, because we're about to dissect the contenders, their motivations, and why the ending sparked so much debate. This is all about Game of Thrones who should have won. Let's get right into it, guys!

The Contenders: A Look at the Major Players

Alright, let's break down the main players who were in the running for the Iron Throne. Each had their supporters, their flaws, and their own vision for Westeros. Understanding their backgrounds and what they represented is key to figuring out who should have won. First, we had Daenerys Targaryen. She started as an underdog, sold off in a marriage for political gain, and rose to become a powerful queen. She gained armies, dragons, and a fervent belief in her destiny to break the wheel and rule justly. Next, there was Jon Snow. The brooding, honorable bastard who went from being a member of the Night's Watch to the King in the North. Jon was loved by the people and seen as a noble leader, even though he often struggled with the burdens of power. Then we had Cersei Lannister. The ultimate survivor, who clawed her way to the top through cunning, ruthlessness, and a complete disregard for anyone who stood in her way. Cersei was the embodiment of ambition and was willing to do anything to protect her children and her claim to the throne. Finally, there was Tyrion Lannister. The brilliant, witty, and often underestimated dwarf, who used his intelligence and political skills to navigate the treacherous world of Westeros. Tyrion, despite his flaws, always aimed to do what was best for the realm.

Daenerys Targaryen: The Dragon Queen's Ambitions

Daenerys Targaryen, or Dany as she's often called, was a complex character. Her journey began in exile, but she quickly grew into a powerful force, conquering cities and freeing slaves. Her core belief was that she was destined to rule and bring a new era of justice to Westeros. Her rise to power was nothing short of legendary. She hatched dragons, gathered loyal followers, and crossed the Narrow Sea, all fueled by a burning desire to reclaim her family's legacy. Dany's vision for Westeros was one of equality and liberation. She wanted to break the wheel of oppression, but, here's where things get tricky. Her methods were often brutal. We saw it in Astapor, Meereen, and eventually, in King's Landing. Dany was willing to use fire and blood to achieve her goals. This led to her downfall. Her descent into madness, fueled by loss and the pressures of power, ultimately led to her destruction. This is why we have to examine whether Dany’s methods aligned with the kind of ruler Westeros actually needed. She definitely had the strength, but the question is if she had the wisdom.

Jon Snow: The Reluctant King

Then there's Jon Snow. The guy, whose true identity as a Targaryen heir was one of the biggest reveals. He always put the good of others before his own desires. Jon was a natural leader, admired for his courage, honor, and sense of duty. He always tried to do what was right, even when it was difficult. Remember his time at the Night's Watch? He constantly went against the grain, advocating for those often overlooked and standing up for what he believed in. His sense of justice was admirable. Yet, Jon wasn't always the best at playing the game of thrones. He was often too trusting, too reluctant to take decisive action, and constantly burdened by the weight of responsibility. His reluctance to embrace the power that was rightfully his, ultimately defined his arc. This quality also made him less likely to commit the atrocities necessary to rule in the brutal world of Westeros. So, the question remains: was his inherent goodness enough to rule the Seven Kingdoms? Or did the Iron Throne need someone with a more ruthless edge?

Cersei Lannister: The Queen of Deceit and Ambition

Cersei Lannister was, without a doubt, a formidable opponent. She was cunning, intelligent, and utterly ruthless. Her primary motivation was always her children and her own survival. She had a certain strategic brilliance, navigating the political landscape with a mix of manipulation, alliances, and outright threats. Cersei's reign was marked by instability and cruelty. She ruled with an iron fist, eliminating anyone who stood in her way. While she was undoubtedly a survivor, her reign was characterized by a lack of compassion and an inability to see beyond her own self-interest. Cersei was the embodiment of power through fear. The question is: could she have been a good ruler? Yes, she protected her family. But was she a good leader for the people? History shows us, a ruthless leader can achieve stability, but at what cost? Cersei's ending showed how dangerous unchecked ambition can be.

Tyrion Lannister: The Wise Hand

And finally, we have Tyrion Lannister. The witty, intelligent, and often underestimated member of the Lannister family. Tyrion, despite facing constant prejudice and adversity, demonstrated a keen understanding of politics and a genuine desire to improve the realm. He often acted as a voice of reason, offering strategic advice, and seeking to mitigate the worst excesses of those in power. Tyrion’s journey wasn't about seeking the throne for himself, but about making the world a better place. He was always trying to do the right thing, even when it wasn't popular. He saw the big picture, understanding the importance of diplomacy, compromise, and long-term stability. Of all the contenders, Tyrion seemed to understand the game of thrones the best, and not only the game but also, how to serve the best of the realm. However, his past mistakes and the prejudices against him, made his path to the throne complicated. Still, he could become a strong leader.

Why the Ending Sparked Controversy

The final season of Game of Thrones was… well, let's just say it sparked a lot of opinions. The rapid pace of the storytelling, the character arcs, and the ultimate outcomes of some of the major plotlines, left many viewers feeling unsatisfied. One of the biggest criticisms was Daenerys's sudden descent into madness. Some argued it was rushed and didn't align with her character development. Others felt Jon's ending was underwhelming, and that his role had been reduced, which did not pay off the expectations that the show had built over the course of the seasons. Cersei's demise was also seen by some as too sudden, and not giving her the consequences her actions deserved. Ultimately, the question of who deserved the throne sparked heated debates. The feeling of many viewers was the show's ending missed the mark. The feeling was that the decisions made in the last season felt forced. This feeling led to the rise of different arguments on social media.

So, Who Should Have Won?

So, after all that, who should have won? It's a tough question, and there's no single right answer, of course. The beauty of Game of Thrones is the moral ambiguity of its characters and the difficult choices they face. However, with the wisdom of hindsight, and after analyzing each character’s strengths, weaknesses, and their impact on the story, Tyrion Lannister seems like the most deserving candidate. He has the intellect and diplomatic skills needed to govern, coupled with a deep understanding of the intricacies of politics and a genuine desire to improve the realm. He was able to serve the best interest of the people. While he has flaws, his ability to learn from his mistakes and to make pragmatic decisions makes him the best choice for the ruler. Jon, with his honorable nature, could have been a strong ruler, but he lacked the political acumen to navigate the treacherous world of Westeros. Daenerys, while a powerful leader, was ultimately undone by her own ambition and her willingness to resort to violence. Cersei, with her cruelty, would have brought Westeros into chaos. Tyrion was the perfect balance of the qualities needed to lead. He understands the power, and the responsibility that comes with it. He knew the importance of diplomacy and making the right decision, even when it was difficult.

Conclusion: The Legacy of the Iron Throne

Game of Thrones captivated audiences with its complex characters, epic battles, and intricate plotlines. The question of who deserved the Iron Throne is a matter of endless debate. Different viewers will have different opinions, depending on their values and their interpretations of the characters. While the ending may have been controversial, the show has left its mark on popular culture. It will continue to be discussed and analyzed for years to come. In the end, the Iron Throne is a symbol of power, responsibility, and the constant struggle for control. And even though there is no definitive answer to the question of who should have won, the debate itself is a testament to the show's enduring legacy. And there is one thing for sure, no matter who won, the game of thrones will be remember forever.

What do you guys think? Let me know in the comments below who you think should have won the Iron Throne! Thanks for reading!